Collaborative science has become a ‘gold standard’ in sustainability science, to address increasingly complex socio-environmental challenges and knowledge divides. Inequalities shaping research collaborations however remain unexplored in the science-policy interface.
To address this gap, Camilla Tetley and Susanne Koch have conducted a critical discourse analysis of texts by international policy and research actors engaged in the global discourse on science for sustainability. It shows that documents of United Nations bodies primarily mediate a deficit narrative, with focus on a lack of resources and innovation capacity in ‘less developed’ countries. The alternative transformation narrative mediated by reports of UNESCO and other science-policy institutions implementing science for the SDGs offers a more complex picture: it accounts for epistemic inequalities and frames research collaboration as essential to address global challenges.